Latitude vs Langfuse

Both open-source, both trace LLM calls. Here is where they differ.

Feature
Langfuse
Latitude
Observability
Tracing & spans
Full tracing + decorators
Full tracing + OTEL-native
Multi-turn agent sessions
Sessions + agent graphs
Full conversation context + tool calls
OTEL compatibility
OTEL-native SDKs
TS + Python + any OTEL exporter
Cost & latency dashboards
Built-in analytics
Token cost + throughput metrics
Issue Management
Issue discovery
Semi-automated semantic grouping
Auto-detected + user-driven via semantic search
Issue lifecycle tracking
No formal issue entity
New → Escalating → Resolved → Regressed
Regression detection
CI/CD score alerting
Auto-surfaces regressions after deploy
Evaluations
LLM-as-a-judge scoring
Built-in evaluators
Custom + auto-generated
Eval generation from failures
Manual failure → dataset pipeline
Auto-generated from discovered issues
Human annotation alignment
Annotations available
MCC metric tracks eval-human agreement
Platform
Self-hosted option
Docker + Kubernetes
MIT, full control
Open-source
MIT license
MIT, 4K+ stars
Free plan
Generous free tier
20K credits/mo, unlimited seats

Already using Datadog or Sentry? Latitude runs alongside them. OTEL-compatible, same protocol you already use. Latitude handles the AI-specific layer: failure patterns, issue lifecycle, agent session tracing. Your APM handles infrastructure.

Both open-source. Latitude adds the intelligence layer that turns raw traces into actionable improvement.

What Latitude adds

From traces to issues

Langfuse gives you raw traces. Latitude detects some failure patterns automatically and lets you discover more via semantic search. Named issues with lifecycle tracking: New, Escalating, Resolved, Regressed. A prioritized queue, not a log dump.

Evals that write themselves

Every time an issue is created, Latitude automatically generates a monitoring eval script for that failure pattern. Runs continuously on live traffic. Calibrated to human judgment via MCC.

Agent-native, not retrofitted

Latitude was built for multi-turn agent workflows from day one. Tool calls, decision chains, non-deterministic paths. Not bolted on after the fact.

See it in action

The agent reliability platform

Traces, issue discovery, evals auto-generated on every new issue, and human alignment — in one continuous loop.

How it works

From failures to evaluations. Automatically.

Latitude's closed-loop system turns production failures into monitoring scripts, calibrated to your definition of quality.

1

Observe

Capture every agent interaction. Spans, traces, sessions. OTEL-compatible SDK.

Traces dashboard showing real-time spans, latency, and cost metrics
2

Discover

Some failures auto-detected. Find more via semantic search over traces — annotate failed ones to create named issues. Prioritized by frequency and impact.

Issues dashboard with failure patterns and lifecycle tracking
3

Evaluate

Eval scripts generated automatically every time an issue is created. Run continuously on matching traces.

Annotation queues for human evaluation and ground truth collection
4

Align

MCC metric measures how well automated evals agree with human judgment. Drift stays visible.

Human review interface showing automated and human verdicts side by side

Continuous loop. Every iteration improves the next.

4,000+

GitHub stars

1,200+

Community members

MIT

Open source

Self-host

Your infrastructure

Teams using Latitude in production

Pew Research CenterSuperlistPlannedLegalitasRetracedVirtuous

Ready to go beyond traces?

See what issue discovery and evals auto-generated on every new issue add to your workflow. Free plan, no credit card required.

Free plan: 20K credits/month No credit card required Open-source (MIT)